Isolation and identification of aerobic polychlorinated biphenyls degrading bacteria
Bibi Fatemeh Nabavi, Mahnaz Nikaeen, Mohammad Mehdi Amin, Maryam Hatamzadeh
Environment Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Isfahan and Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, IUMS, Isfahan, Iran
|Date of Web Publication||29-Nov-2013|
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezar Jerib Avenue, Isfahan
Source of Support: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Conflict of Interest: None
Aims: The purpose of this study was to isolate and identify aerobic polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) degrading bacteria.
Materials and Methods: This study was performed in lab scale aerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor. Polyurethane foams were used as bio-carrier and synthetic wastewater was prepared with PCBs in transformer oil as the main substrate (20-700 μg/l) and acetone as a solvent for PCBs as well as microelements. After achieving to adequate microbial population and acclimation of microorganisms to PCB compounds with high efficiency of PCB removal, identification of degrading microbial species was performed by 16s rRNA gene sequencing of isolated bacteria.
Results: Gene sequencing results of the isolated bacteria showed that Rhodococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Pseudoxanthomonas spp., Agromyces spp., and Brevibacillus spp. were dominant PCB-degrading bacteria.
Conclusion: PCB compounds can be degraded by some microorganisms under aerobic or anaerobic conditions or at least be reduced to low chlorinated congeners, despite their chemical stability and toxicity. Based on the results of the study, five bacterial species capable of degrading PCBs in transformer oil have been identified.
Keywords: Aerobic bacteria, biodegradation, polychlorinated biphenyls
|How to cite this article:|
Nabavi BF, Nikaeen M, Amin MM, Hatamzadeh M. Isolation and identification of aerobic polychlorinated biphenyls degrading bacteria. Int J Env Health Eng 2013;2:47
|How to cite this URL:|
Nabavi BF, Nikaeen M, Amin MM, Hatamzadeh M. Isolation and identification of aerobic polychlorinated biphenyls degrading bacteria. Int J Env Health Eng [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 Oct 21];2:47. Available from: https://www.ijehe.org/text.asp?2013/2/1/47/122443
| Introduction|| |
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are synthetic aromatic compounds containing two benzene rings with one to ten chlorine atoms. There are 209 different compounds called congeners that vary in the number and position of their chlorines.  PCBs are poorly soluble in water but lipophilicity of PCBs contributes to their accumulation in oils and fats and magnification in food chain.  Due to their chemical and physical stabilities, PCBs were extensively used in a wide range of industrial applications such as transformer oils, hydraulic fluids, capacitor dielectrics, heat exchanger, plasticizers, waxes, and pesticide extender.  Owing to their toxicity and persistence in the environment, production and usage of PCBs were banned in the USA since 1979. However, because of their widespread use, PCBs have been largely released in the environment and are today detected in every compartment of the ecosystem, such as air, water, soil, sediments, and living organisms. Since PCBs are lipophilic in nature, their bioaccumulation in cells and food chain makes a threat for animal and human health  and concern about environmental pollution with these persistent organic pollutants is increasing.  These compounds are absorbed through the skin, lungs, and gastrointestinal tract in human and animals. Studies on animals showed that PCBs are carcinogenic. Short-term consumption of food containing large amount of PCBs can lead to liver damage and death in animals.  In humans, PCBs have been identified as potential carcinogens and teratogens.  Some epidemiological studies on workers exposed to PCBs showed that exposure to this contaminant has been eventuated to liver damage and malignant melanoma.  Researches have also showed that exposure to high concentration of PCBs causes a variety of adverse health effects, including skin disease (chlorance), liver damage (e.g., clinical hepatitis), and non-cancer short-term effects such as body weight loss, impaired immune function, and damage to the central nervous system.  Therefore, the investigation of treatment options for removal of PCBs from waste chemicals is of major importance.  Several physicochemical processes such as incineration, photolysis, reductive dehalogenation in presence of metals or strong base for destruction of PCBs have been proposed. , However, incineration as a conventional disposal method with high efficiency could emit toxic compounds and is extremely costly.  Since microorganisms play a fundamental role in the removal of waste chemical compounds and persistent organic pollutants,  recently, microbial degradation of PCBs is considered as one of the most effective methods for removing the compound from the environment. , Studies on biodegradation of PCBs have showed that the compounds can be converted to mineral or lower toxicity materials.  Two distinct mechanisms for the microbial degradation of PCBs have been identified : o0 xidative degradation by aerobic bacteria and reductive dehalogenation by anaerobic ones.  The purpose of this study was to isolate and identify aerobic PCB-degrading bacteria which have ability to metabolize PCBs contaminated transformer oils.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Set-up and adaptation
This study was performed in lab scale aerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor [Figure 1]. Polyurethane foams were used as bio-carrier and reactor was inoculated with a mixture of thickened activated sludge from a municipal wastewater treatment and transformer contaminated soil microbial consortium has already been acclimatized to PCB in a batch experiment. Synthetic wastewater was prepared with PCBs in transformer oil as the main substrate (20-700 μg/l) and acetone as a solvent for PCBs as well as microelements. The composition of mineral medium was as follows: NH 4 Cl, 0.16 g/l; K 2 HPO 4 , 0.58 g/l; KH 2 PO 4 , 0.23 g/l; MgSO 4Χ7H 2 O, 0.09 g/l; CaCl 2Χ2H 2 O, 0.07 g/l; and trace elements (1 ml/l wastewater) as follows: FeCl 3Χ6H 2 O, 1.5 g/l; H 3 BO 3 , 0.15 g/l; CuSO 4Χ5H 2 O, 0.03 g/l; KI, 0.03 g/l; MnCl 2Χ4H 2 O, 0.12 g/l; Na 2 MoO 4Χ2H 2 O, 0.06 g/l; ZnSO 4Χ7H 2 O, 0.12 g/l; and CoCl 2Χ6H 2 O, 0.15 g/l.  After achieving to adequate microbial population and acclimation of microorganisms to PCB compounds with high efficiency of PCB removal, identification of degrading microbial species was performed. Biodegradation of PCBs in transformer oil was confirmed and quantified with gas chromatography (AGILENT 6890 N, USA) equipped with an electron capture detector and a capillary column (30 m Χ 0.32 mm) with HP-5 phase after extraction. Purification and separation of PCB compounds in transformer oils and effluent samples were conducted by liquid-liquid extraction using n-hexane.
|Figure 1: Scheme of aerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor containing immobilized biomass: (1) Substrate tank, (2) SBBR, (3) water bath, (4) feed pump, (5) discharge pump, (6) air pump, (7) treated effluent, and (8) programmable logic controller (PLC) and timers|
Click here to view
Culture medium was similar to nutrient composition of the input to reactor in which 15 g/l agar was also added to media and mixed by heat. After media were autoclaved and cooled to 50ΊC, PCB compound was added to the culture medium and was inserted to the plates before hardening. ,
Molecular identification of microorganisms
Biofilm samples were collected at the end of the experiment by scraping biomass from the bio-carriers and vortexing in 5 ml of sterile water for 5 min to homogenize the bacteria. Aliquots of biofilm samples were then spread on synthetic wastewater agar plates and incubated at 30ΊC. After 2-7 days of incubation, all bacterial colonies were characterized based on the colony and cell morphology. Each distinct colony was suspended in 100 μl of deionized water and genomic DNA was extracted by boiling for 15 min and centrifuging at 13,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of 16s rDNA with Eubac27F and 1492R1 primers,  which amplifies a ~1,420 base pair (bp) fragments of 16s rRNA gene. The PCR amplification was conducted in a final volume of 50 μl containing 2 μl of template DNA, 0.2 μM of each primer, 0.2 mM of each dNTPs, 5 μl of 10Χ PCR buffer, and 1.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase. PCR was performed with an initial denaturation for 5 min at 95ΊC followed by 30 cycles of 94ΊC for 45 s, 55ΊC for 1 min, 72ΊC for 1.30 min and, a final extension at 72ΊC for 5 min. The PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis using 1.5% gel containing ethidium bromide together with DNA molecular weight marker. Gels were viewed on a UV transilluminator (UV TECH, France) and sizes of DNA fragment were compared with 100 bp ladder DNA. The DNA sequencing of the amplified gene was performed, and DNA sequence-analysis was undertaken by BLAST algorithms and databases from the National Center for Biotechnology (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
| Results|| |
At the end of the experiment, seven different bacterial colonies were developed on PCB agar culture with regard to apparent characteristics were isolated [Table 1]. 16s rRNA gene sequence analysis of seven isolated bacterial colonies grown in the presence of PCBs showed the presence of five bacterial strains of aerobic PCB-degrading bacteria [Table 2]. Overall, PCBs biodegradation was observed in the range of 99.2-99.7% for PCBs concentration from 20 to 700 μg/l.
| Discussion|| |
Several microorganisms have been isolated and characterized that can degrade PCBs preferentially the lowest chlorinated congeners in aerobic conditions.  In 1983, Furukawa first studied microbial degradation of PCBs and identified the number of PCB-degrading bacteria.  In this work, a preliminary characterization of dominant PCB-degrading bacteria was performed; based on 16sRNA gene sequence, five PCB-degrading bacterial strains were found to be mainly gram-positive bacteria as shown in [Table 2]. PCB-degrading bacterial strains including gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Achromobacter, Alcaligenes, Comamonas, and gram-positive bacteria such as Corynebacterium, Rhodococcus, and Bacillus have also been described by others. , Fedi et al.  (2001) reported 15 bacterial strains using biphenyl as sole carbon and energy source belonged to Pseudomonas spp., Alcaligenes spp., Comamonas spp., Ralstonia spp. Aerobic oxidative degradation consist of two group of genes: First group responsible for converting PCB congeners to chlorobenzoic acid and second group is responsible for degrading chlorobenzoic acid.  Mostly, bacteria degrade PCBs by upper biphenyl pathway that is initiated by 2,3-biphenyl dioxygenase. This enzyme can be caused to cleave PCB compound at 2,3 positions.  When biphenyl is used by bacteria, the ring meta-cleavage, yellow compound is produced. This has been observed in most bacteria especially by the Pseudomonas spp. In the study about 5 months after reactor performance and achieving to maximum efficiency removal, the yellow color was observed in the effluent of the reactors. The effluent samples were analyzed by gas chromatography and the presence of chlorobenzoic confirmed mineralization of PCBs. Wagner et al.  (1998) studied biodegradability of PCB compounds by aerobic bacteria with a batch system and observed the yellow color after 5 months. Gene sequencing results of the isolated bacteria showed that Rhodococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Pseudoxanthomonas spp., Agromyces spp., and Brevibacillus spp. were dominant PCB-degrading bacteria. Chang et al.  (2005) isolated Pseudoxanthomonas spp. from oil contaminated wastewater. The degradation of PCB by immobilized cells of Pseudomonas spp. on Siran carrier also resulted in 52-99% after 3 weeks.  Baxter et al. reported 76% and 88% decreasing in Aroclor 1242 for Nocardia spp. and Pseudomonas spp., respectively, during 52-day incubation.  PCBs biodegradation was observed in the range of 99.2-99.7% for PCBs concentration from 20 to 700 μg/l. Boyle et al. also reported between 12.8% and 24.5% of degradation when Comamonas testosterone and Rhodococcus rhodochrous were inoculated at a concentration of either 5 ppm or 10 ppm of Aroclor 1242, respectively.  In another study, Tartakovsky et al. (2001) showed the presence of Pseudomonas and Xanthomonas spp. in the bioaugmented reactor, and Pseudomonas, Rhodococcus, and Alcaligenes spp. in the non-bioaugmented reactor. In this study, we found other bacterial strains, such as Brevibacillus and Agromyces spp. that could contribute to the removal of PCB contaminated transformer oil.
In conclusion, PCB compounds can be degraded by some microorganisms under aerobic or anaerobic conditions or at least be reduced to low chlorinated congeners, despite their chemical stability and toxicity. Based on the results of the study, five bacterial species capable of degrading PCBs in transformer oil have been identified.
| Acknowledgement|| |
This article is the result of MSc. thesis approved in the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS). The authors wish to acknowledge to Vice Chancellery of Research of IUMS for the financial support; Research Project # 389268.
| References|| |
|1.||Hatamian-Zarmi A, Shojaosadati SA, Vasheghani-Farahani E, Hosseinkhani S, Emamzadeh A. Extensive biodegradation of highly chlorinated biphenyl and Aroclor 1242 by pseudomonas aeruginosa TMU56 isolated from contaminated soils. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 2009;63:788-94. |
|2.||Borja J, Taleon DM, Auresenia J, Gallardo S. Polychlorinated biphenyls and their biodegradation. Process Biochem 2005;40:1999-2013. |
|3.||Furukawa K, Fujihara H. Microbial degradation of polychlorinated biphenyls: Biochemical and molecular features. J Biosci Bioeng 2008;105:433-49. |
|4.||Correa PA, Lin L, Just CL, Hu D, Hornbuckle KC, Schnoor JL, et al. The effects of individual PCB congeners on the soil bacterial community structure and the abundance of biphenyl dioxygenase genes. Environ Int 2010;36:901-6. |
|5.||Abraham WR, Nogales B, Golyshin PN, Pieper DH, Timmis KN. Polychlorinated biphenyl-degrading microbial communities in soils and sediments. Curr Opin Microbiol 2002;5:246-53. |
|6.||Adebusoye SA, Ilori MO, Picardal FW, Amund OO. Extensive biodegradation of polychlorinated biphenyls in Aroclor 1242 and electrical transformer fluid (Askarel) by natural strains of microorganisms indigenous to contaminated African systems. Chemosphere 2008;73:126-32. |
|7.||Gioia DD, Bertin L, Zanaroli G, Marchetti L, Fava F. Polychlorinated biphenyl degradation in aqueous wastes by employing continuous fixed-bed bioreactors. Process Biochem 2006;41:935-40. |
|8.||Sobiecka E, Cedzynska K, Bielski C, Antizar-Ladislao B. Biological treatment of transformer oil using commercial mixtures of microorganisms. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 2009;63:328-33. |
|9.||Kastánek F, Kastánek P. Combined decontamination processes for wastes containing PCBs. J Hazard Mater 2005;117:185-205. |
|10.||Pieper DH, Seeger M. Bacterial metabolism of polychlorinated biphenyls. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 2008;15:121-38. |
|11.||Jia LY, Zheng AP, Xu L, Huang XD, Zhang Q, Yang FL. Isolation and characterization of comprehensive polychlorinated biphenyl degrading bacterium, Enterobacter sp. LY402. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2008;18:952-7. |
|12.||Furukawa K. Biochemical and genetic bases of microbial degradation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). J Gen Appl Microbiol 2000;46:283-296. |
|13.||Beun JJ, Hendriks A, van Loosdrecht MC, Morgenroth E, Wilderer PA, Heijnen JJ. Aerobic granulation in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Res 1999;33:2283-90. |
|14.||Leigh MB, Prouzová P, Macková M, Macek T, Nagle DP, Fletcher JS. Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-degrading bacteria associated with trees in a PCB-contaminated site. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006;72:2331-42. |
|15.||Petric I, Hrsak D, Fingler S, Voncina E, Cetkovic H, Kolar AB, et al. Enrichment and characterization of PCB-degrading bacteria as potential seed cultures for bioremediation of contaminated soil. Food Technol Biotechnol 2007;45:11-20. |
|16.||Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing, In E. Stackebrandt and M. Goodfellow (ed.), Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons; 1991. p. 115-75. |
|17.||Fedi S, Carnevali M, Fava F, Andracchio A, Zappoli S, Zannoni D. Polychlorinated biphenyl degradation activities and hybridization analyses of fifteen aerobic strains isolated from a PCB-contaminated site. Res Microbiol 2001;152:583-92. |
|18.||Nwinyi O. Degradation of askarel (PCB blend) by indigenous aerobic bacteria isolates from dumpsites in Ore, Ondo State. Nigeria. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 2010;4:3938-48. |
|19.||Wagner-Döbler I, Bennasar A, Vancanneyt M, Strömpl C, Brümmer I, Eichner C, et al. Microcosm enrichment of biphenyl-degrading microbial communities from soils and sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998;64:3014-22. |
|20.||Chang JS, Chou CL, Lin GH, Sheu SY, Chen WM. Pseudoxanthomonas kaohsiungensis, sp. nov., a novel bacterium isolated from oil-polluted site produces extracellular surface activity. Syst Appl Microbiol 2005;28:137-44. |
|21.||Komancová M, Jurcová I, Kochánková L, Burkhard J. Metabolic pathways of polychlorinated biphenyls degradation by Pseudomonas sp. 2. Chemosphere 2003;50:537-43. |
|22.||Tartakovsky B, Michott A, Cadieux JC, Hawari J, Guiot SR. Degradation of Aroclor 1242 in a single-stage coupled anaerobic/aerobic bioreactor. Water Res 2001;35:4323-30. |
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Assessment of Biodegradation Efficiency of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) in Soil Using Three Individual Bacterial Strains and Their Mixed Culture
| ||Teresa Steliga,Katarzyna Wojtowicz,Piotr Kapusta,Joanna Brzeszcz |
| ||Molecules. 2020; 25(3): 709 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||PCBs attenuation and abundance of Dehalococcoides spp., bphC, CheA, and flic genes in typical polychlorinated biphenyl-polluted soil under floody and dry soil conditions
| ||Muhammad Zaffar Hashmi,Zhihui Qin,Xiaoyan Yao,Zulkifl Ahmed,Su Xiaomei,Chaofeng Shen,Xianjin Tang |
| ||Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2016; 23(4): 3907 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|