The evaluation of heat stress through monitoring environmental factors and physiological responses in melting and casting industries workers
Habibollah Dehghan1, Seyed Bagher Mortazavi1, Mohammad Javad Jafari2, Mohammad Reza Maracy3, Mahdi Jahangiri4
1 Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Environmental Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4 Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
|Date of Web Publication||15-May-2012|
Seyed Bagher Mortazavi
Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran
Source of Support: University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran, Iran., Conflict of Interest: None
Aims: Evaluation of heat stress in workers exposed to hot/dry conditions of melting and casting industry is imperative for management of heat stress. This study aims to compare results of heat strain evaluation by monitoring environmental factors and physiological responses.
Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that was conducted on 51 workers of a large melting and casting company in 2010. Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) index, heart rate and ear canal temperature were measured by WBGT meter, heart rate monitor and personal heat stress monitor, respectively. Physical activity intensity was assessed based on the ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation test.
Results: WBGT index in 64.7% of workstations exceeded 30°C and in 41.2% was over 32°C. The value of WBGT index in 69% of work stations exceeded the threshold limit of the ACGIH standard. The physiological strain index (PSI) in 31% of worker was higher than 5, although its mean measured at 3.8 (1.8). Increase in the ear canal temperature in 64.7% of cases (33 persons) was over 1°C. Correlation between WBGT index with ear canal temperature and PSI index, adjusted body mass index and age, was 0.67 and 0.69 (P < 0.0001).
Conclusion: In hot/dry conditions of melting and casting processes, despite moderate correlation between WBGT index with ear canal temperature and PSI index, work-rest cycles of WBGT index is not applicable for many of the workstations. Therefore, heat stress evaluation based on physiological variables probably has higher validity and is more appropriate.
Keywords: Ear canal temperature, heart rate, heat stress, hot/dry conditions, WBGT index, PSI index
|How to cite this article:|
Dehghan H, Mortazavi SB, Jafari MJ, Maracy MR, Jahangiri M. The evaluation of heat stress through monitoring environmental factors and physiological responses in melting and casting industries workers. Int J Env Health Eng 2012;1:21
|How to cite this URL:|
Dehghan H, Mortazavi SB, Jafari MJ, Maracy MR, Jahangiri M. The evaluation of heat stress through monitoring environmental factors and physiological responses in melting and casting industries workers. Int J Env Health Eng [serial online] 2012 [cited 2021 Oct 28];1:21. Available from: https://www.ijehe.org/text.asp?2012/1/1/21/96144
| Introduction|| |
Workplace conditions in some of the melting and casting industries in developing countries, for lack of automation and perform of physical hard work, are so serve that production line workers exposure to extreme heat.  Prolonged work under these conditions causes heat strain. Sustained heat strain in the expose to hot conditions, doing heavy physical work, the use of the personal protective clothes and equipments form insulation against water vapor and heat, resulting in heat exhaustion. ,, Heat stroke, , muscular cramp,  increased human error, reduced mental and physical activities, ,, increased accidents at work and ultimately reduced productivity. ,,,
In the melting and casting processes, particularly during the hot months of the year, since atmosphere is warmer together with the heat radiated from molten material and hot surfaces of the cast, heat stress becomes one of the most important physical harmful agents in such environments. Therefore, dealing with heat stress in workers of these industrial units is mandatory and prevention of heat-related illnesses and maintaining workforce efficiency, necessitates continual measurement and evaluation of heat stress for the purpose of its proper management.
In the past century, for the evaluation of heat stress in hot environments, a number of indices were introduced, but only a few of them were used worldwide. WBGT index (Wet Bulb Globe Temperature) has been one of the best known and most widely used of all thermal indices which contained important environmental factors such as dry bulb temperature, wet bulb temperature and globe temperature in its equation. ,, In the calculation of this index, non-environmental factors are not accounted for, but factors such as clothing, level of metabolism and acclimatization are used in the description of this index. Often in the evaluation of the level of metabolism for use in the description of the WBGT index, large variations are observed, causing oscillation in the results obtained for the index. ,, Also, because of the self-pacing phenomenon in very hot conditions,  WBGT index tends to overestimate level of heat stress in personnel exposed to heat in many hot countries such as China, India, Thailand, and Dubai. , Moran et al. introduced Physiological Strain Index (PSI) for the evaluation of the heat strain in 1998. This index is calculated using Equation (1) in which variation in rectal temperature (T c ) and heart rate (HR) are compared under rest and work conditions. Tr, Tw, HRr, HRw stand for deep body temperature and heart rate in rest and work periods, respectively.
This index compares changes of rectal temperature (T re ) and heart rate (HR) at two rest and work states according to Equation 1:
where T re t and HR t are simultaneous measurements taken at any time during the exposure and T re0 and HR 0 are the initial measurements. Numerical values of this index range 0-10, in which 0 indicates lack of thermal stress and 10 shows its maximum value.  Validity of this index for men and women under various conditions of work has been studied. This physiological index evaluates level of heat stress resulting from environmental factors, clothing, level of activity and personal particulars such as sex, age, etc. ,,
In the evaluation of thermal stress under dry/hot conditions, question arises as to the usefulness of the cycles of work-rest of WBGT index based on the ACGIH Standard, which at present time is widely used for the evaluation of thermal stress in the environments of melting and casting processes, and whether WBGT index is an appropriate index for the physiological heat strain estimation in the dry/hot conditions of these industrial processes. To answer this question, WBGT and PSI indices in the workers exposed to heat were measured simultaneously. Effectiveness of the usage of WBGT index for evaluating heat stress in dry/hot conditions was assessed through comparison of the results of monitoring environmental factors and physiological responses.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This cross-sectional study was performed on 51 workers of a melting and casting company in central Iran during June and July 2010. Permit for this study was obtained from the medical ethics committee of the school of medical sciences of the University of Tarbiat Modares. These workers were selected randomly on the basis of the required criteria for this study (no cardiovascular, respiratory and infectious diseases, diabetes and hyperthyroidism and did not take cardiovascular medicine and minimum 2 weeks presence at workplace), and being exposed to important factors that cause thermal stress.
On the day of the experiment, after taking measurements of weight, height and recording any previous heat-related illnesses they may have had, workers were attached to a heart rate monitoring device (Polar Electro RS100, Finland).  This device uses a sensor stuck to the chest and a receiver similar to a wrist watch strapped around the person's wrist. Also a portable Personal Heat Stress Monitor (Questemp ii), to measure deep body temperature was used via the ear of the person. ,, This device contains a temperature sensor which is placed inside the outer ear and a processing system and monitor attached to the persons belt. To reduce atmospheric effects on the measured temperature, the sensor is completely insulated.  After 30 minutes of rest in the cool room (WBGT = 23.6 + 1.4), heart rate and ear canal temperature were measured and the mean heart rate and ear canal temperature under rest conditions were recorded.  Then without disconnecting measuring devices, the workers were asked to return to their workstations and start work. After beginning of work, measurements of heart rate and ear canal temperature at intervals of 20, 40, and 60 minutes were recorded.  At the same time as measuring heart rate and ear canal temperature, dry bulb temperature, wet bulb temperature, globe temperature and WBGT index during work and rest, using WBGT meter (Cassella model) based on ISO7243 Standard were also measured. , Also in this study, to estimate level of workers physical activity, the Persian version of the perceived exertion rate of Stone-Parfitt , was used.
These experiments were carried out indoors, at 9-12 pm. At the end of the measurements, PSI index and difference between ear canal Temperature in rest and work state (∆T) were calculated. Based on the American Conferences Governmental industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) TLVs for the year 2006, values of the WBGT index on three levels of light work, medium work and heavy work were classified. Distribution of the PSI index, heart rate, ear canal temperature and ∆T in different levels of WBGT index were established by using SPSS-18 software.
| Results|| |
This cross-sectional study was conducted on 51 unskilled and semi-skilled workers of a large melting and casting company in 2010. Mean (standard deviation) age 32.1 (4.8) years, height 176 (6.0) cm, weight 77.7 (10.4) kg and body mass index 25.0 (3.1) kg/m 2 and 11.8% of these workers (6 persons) having had heat strokes previously.
Mean (standard deviation) dry bulb temperature, wet bulb temperature, globe temperature and relative humidity were 41.8°C (6.1), 24.8°C (3.2), 45.8°C (7.8), and 25% (4.2), respectively. The values of WBGT index in 64.7% of the workstations were over 30°C and in 41.2% was over 32°C [Table 1]. Mean WBGT index in 51 workstations was 30.7°C (4.2) and varied over 22.0-40.8°C range. Mean WBGT index at time intervals of 20, 40 and 60 minutes measured; 30.7°C (4.8), 30.7°C (4.4) and 31.2°C (4.5), respectively. The value of WBGT with respect to physical activity, in 69% (35 cases) of workstations exceeded standard threshold of ACGIH for continuous work and acclimatized.
Physical activity of the workers based on the Rating Perceived Exertion of Stone-Parfitt were 39% of the cases light, 31% of cases medium, and 30% of cases heavy.
The physiological strain index (PSI) in 31.4% of workers was over 5 [Table 2], although its mean (standard deviation) was 3.8 (1.8) within 0.6-9.0 range. Mean value of the PSI index in time intervals of 20, 40, and 60 minutes, after being exposed to the heat, measured as 3.4 (1.9), 3.9 (1.9) and 4.2 (1.9), respectively. Mean physiological stress in workers in all three time intervals was in the range of low to medium.
Mean (standard deviation) heart rate during at rest and work period were obtained 76 (7.5) and 111 (22.7) beat/min. Mean heart beat during light, medium, and heavy work were 91 (11.8), 114.3 (16.9), and 133.5 (15.0), respectively.
Mean (standard deviation) ear canal temperature at rest and work obtained were 36.3°C (0.6), and 37.0°C (0.8), respectively. Mean ear canal temperature during light, medium, and heavy work were 37.6C (0.5), 38.2C (0.6), and 38.0C (0.7), respectively. Values of the ear canal temperature difference at rest and work (∆T) in 61% of cases (31 persons) exceeded 1°C. Correlation between WBGT index with ear canal temperature and PSI index, adjusted with body mass index and age, were 0.67 and 0.69, respectively. (P < 0.0001).
| Discussions|| |
The value of the WBGT index, with respect to physical activity level, in 69% of the cases exceeded the standard threshold limit of ACGIH for Acclimatizing Workers and continuous work. Thus, based on ACGIH standard, workplace heat was stressful in 69% of the people in the study, but based on physiological responses, intensity of heat strain was over the value 5 only in 31% of workers. Comparison of results obtained for environmental conditions (WBGT index) and physiological responses (PSI index), based on increasing values of WBGT index [Table 3] reveals that: with uniform increase in WBGT index, PSI index in all three levels of physical activity, increases with relative regularity, but values of physiological strain in 86% of workers [Table 2], range between Low to Medium (less than 6). In a similar study by Mr. Moatamedzadeh et al. on assessing heat stress in workers in a warm and humid coastal region south of Iran, found that in spite of the fact that all the workers were exposed to the conditions exceeding ACGIH standard, based on given biological values (heart beat and oral temperature) only 16.25% showed signs of thermal stress. 
WBGT index is an empirical index which contains, in its calculation, important environmental factors, and other non-environmental factors, important in producing thermal stress such as physical activity, type of work clothes, and acclimatization to heat, are used in the interpretation of results of this index. In this study, one of the reasons for reduction in heat strain based on PSI in comparison with heat stress based on WBGT index is probably, occurrence of the phenomenon of self-pacing in the level of activity which is taken up by people to reduce heat strain.  Self-pacing of physical activity is a preventive behavior that occurs when people are exposed to extreme temperature  and the role it plays in reducing occurrence of thermal stress has been shown in several studies. ,,,, Donoghue et al. have recognized training to self-pace activity or rest when working under harsh conditions as necessary procedures to reduce heat exhaustion in deep mining workers. ,, Brake et al. in their research on level of fatigue in mine workers exposed to heat stress environment (WBGT = 30.8) found that, self-pacing of activity level by workers was very probable.  Soule et al. found that in environmental conditions where wet temperature exceeds 33.5°C and deep body temperature increases, self-pacing of work activity occurs.  Mairiux et al. concluded that self-pacing via a work-rest cycle by workers exposed to heat is an effective device against physiological strain.  Miller et al. observed that when self-pacing, mean heart beat, seldom goes over 110-115 beat/min.  Also, Rastogi et al. studying correlation between globe temperature and heart rate in workers of a glass factory reached the conclusion that globe temperature alone cannot assess heat strain.  In a similar study, Bate et al. working on physiological response of construction workers in United Arab Emirates concluded that maintaining bodily fluids level and self-pacing of work enabled workers to do their work in the summer without occurrence of extreme physiological response,  which is in agreement with the results of this study.
Therefore, in this study, taking into account periods of rest in a cool place and allowing personnel to self-pace, despite environmental conditions of workplace being stressful, level of physiological responses of workers was lower than the level of heat stress based on WBGT index. It appears that in extreme dry/hot environment of melting and casting processes, as dry and radiant temperatures are higher (41.8°C and 45.8°C, respectively) than skin temperature (35°C), body absorbs heat when exposed to hot air and radiant heat,  thence, heat loss mechanisms through radiation and convection are not sufficiently effective and the only way to heat loss is through evaporation of sweat from the skin surface. Due to low relative humidity (25% in this study), efficiency of heat losing through evaporation of sweat is desirable, That is why, despite stressfulness of the environmental conditions based on WBGT index values, in a considerable number of workstations (mainly in light and medium work), PSI index which is a physiological body response indicator is limited to the low to medium range, so that only 12% of people under this condition had previous heat stroke records.
| Conclusions|| |
In extreme dry/hot conditions of the melting and casting processes, work-rest regimes of WBGT index in many work stations tend not to be useful and despite moderate correlation between WBGT index and PSI index, since evaporation of sweat from skin is an effective mechanism, heart rate and ear canal temperature are within an acceptable range. Therefore, evaluation of heat stress under these conditions based on physiological responses is probably of higher validity compared with WBGT index and its usage for the upkeep of workers efficiency and maintenance of work-rest cycle is more acceptable for the industrial health and safety officer as well as the employers.
| Acknowledgments|| |
The authors of this study are grateful to Dr Majid Ghanaee, the Occupational Medicine Physician and Eng Ahmadi, HSE manager, of the Isfahan steel company.
| References|| |
|1.||Fujii RK, Horie S, Tsutsui T, Nagano C. Heat exposure control using non-refrigerated water in Brazilian steel factory workers. Ind Health 2007;45:100-6. |
|2.||Ftaiti F, Grélot L, Coudreuse JM, Nicol C. Combined effect of heat stress, dehydration and exercise on neuromuscular function in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 2001;84:87-94. |
|3.||Nielsen B, Hyldig T, Bidstrup F, Gonzalez-Alonso J, Christoffersen G. Brain activity and fatigue during prolonged exercise in the heat. Pflugers Arch 2001;442:41-8. |
|4.||Nybo L, Nielsen B. Hyperthermia and central fatigue during prolonged exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol 2001;91:1055. |
|5.||Barrow MW, Clark KA. Heat-related illnesses. Am Fam Physician 1998;58:749-56. |
|6.||Dehghan H, Mortazavi SB, Jafari MJ, Maracy MR. Combined application of wet-bulb globe temperature and heart rate under hot climatic conditions: A guide to better estimation of the heat strain. Feyz 2012;16:112-20. |
|7.||Kovats RS, Hajat S. Heat stress and public health: A critical review. Annu Rev Public Health 2008;29:41-55. |
|8.||Hancock P, Vasmatzidis I. Effects of heat stress on cognitive performance: The current state of knowledge. Int J Hyperthermia 2003;19:355-72. |
|9.||Brisswalter J, Collardeau M, Rene A. Effects of acute physical exercise characteristics on cognitive performance. Sports Med 2002;32:555-66. |
|10.||Hocking C, Silberstein RB, Lau WM, Stough C, Roberts W. Evaluation of cognitive performance in the heat by functional brain imaging and psychometric testing* 1. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 2001;8:1234-719. |
|11.||Miller V, Bates G. Hydration of outdoor workers in north-west Australia. J Occup Health Safety, Aust NZ 2007;23:79-87. |
|12.||Ramsey JD, Burford CL, Beshir MY, Jensen RC. Effects of workplace thermal conditions on safe work behavior 1. J Safety Res 1983;14:105-14. |
|13.||Axelson O. Influence of heat exposure on productivity. Work Environ Health 1974;11:94. |
|14.||Kjellstrom T, Holmer I, Lemke B. Workplace heat stress, health and productivity-an increasing challenge for low and middle-income countries during climate change. Citation: Global Health Action; 2009. |
|15.||Parsons K. Heat stress Standard ISO 7243 and its global application. Ind Health 2006;44:368-79. |
|16.||Budd GM. Wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT)-its history and its limitations. J Sci Med Sport 2008;11:20-32. |
|17.||Yaglou C, Minard D. Control of heat casualties at military training centers. AMA Arch Ind Health 1957;16:302. |
|18.||Wästerlund DS. A review of heat stress research with application to forestry. Appl Ergon 1998;29:179-83. |
|19.||Miller V, Bates G, Schneider JD, Thomsen J. Self-Pacing as a Protective Mechanism against the Effects of Heat Stress. Ann Occup Hyg 2011;55:548-55. |
|20.||Holmér I. Climate change and occupational heat stress: Methods for assessment. Vol 3. Citation: Global Health Action; 2010,3:5719-DOI:10.3402/gha.v3io.5719. |
|21.||Bates GP, Schneider J. Hydration status and physiological workload of UAE construction workers: A prospective longitudinal observational study. J Occup Med Toxicol 2008;3:21. |
|22.||Moran DS, Shitzer A, Pandolf KB. A physiological strain index to evaluate heat stress. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1998;275:R129. |
|23.||Moran DS, Montain SJ, Pandolf KB. Evaluation of different levels of hydration using a new physiological strain index. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1998;275:R854. |
|24.||Moran D, Pandolf K, Shapiro Y, Laor A, Heled Y, Gonzalez R. Evaluation of the environmental stress index for physiological variables. J Therm Biol 2003;28:43-9. |
|25.||Pandolf KB, Moran DS. Recent heat and cold strain predictive indices. Elsevier Ergonomics Book Series; 2005;3:487-94. |
|26.||Lumingu HMM, Dessureault P. Physiological responses to heat strain: A study on personal monitoring for young workers. J Therm Biol 2009;34:299-305. |
|27.||Muir I, Bishop P, Lomax R, Green J. Prediction of rectal temperature from ear canal temperature. Ergonomics 2001;44:962-72. |
|28.||Richardson JE, Capra MF. Physiological responses of firefighters wearing level 3 chemical protective suits while working in controlled hot environments. J Occup Environ Med 2001;43:1064. |
|29.||Sazama M. The effect of vapor permeable versus non-vapor permeable shirts on heat stress. Master of Science Thesis Report, University of Wisconsin-Stout, USA, 2001. |
|30.||Shibasaki M, Kondo N, Tominaga H, Aoki K, Hasegawa E, Idota Y, et al. Continuous measurement of tympanic temperature with a new infrared method using an optical fiber. J Appl Physiol 1998;85:921. |
|31.||Saha R, Dey NC, Samanta A, Biswas R. A comparison of cardiac strain among drillers of two different age groups in underground manual coal mines in India. J Occup Health 2008;50:512-20. |
|32.||Faulkner J, Eston RG. Perceived exertion research in the 21st century: Developments, reflections and questions for the future. J Exerc Sci Fit 2008;6:26-32. |
|33.||Fuller FH, Smith PE. Evaluation of heat stress in a hot workshop by physiological measurements. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1981;42:32-7. |
|34.||Motamedzade M, Azari MR. Heat stress evaluation using environmental and biological monitoring. Pak J Biol Science 2006;9:457-9. |
|35.||Donoghue AM, Sinclair MJ, Bates GP. Heat exhaustion in a deep underground metalliferous mine. Occup Environ Med 2000;57:165. |
|36.||Brake DJ, Bates GP. Deep body core temperatures in industrial workers under thermal stress. J Occup Environ Med 2002;44:125. |
|37.||Donoghue A, Bates G. The risk of heat exhaustion at a deep underground metalliferous mine in relation to surface temperatures. Occup Med 2000;50:334. |
|38.||Mairiaux P, Malchaire J. Workers self-pacing in hot conditions: A case study. Appl Ergon 1985;16:85-90. |
|39.||Brake D, Bates G. Fatigue in industrial workers under thermal stress on extended shift lengths. Occup Med 2001;51:456. |
|40.||Soule RG, Pandolf KB, Goldman RF. Voluntary march rate as a measure of work output in the heat. Ergonomics 1978;21:455. |
|41.||Miller VS, Bates GP. The Thermal Work Limit is a simple reliable heat index for the protection of workers in thermally stressful environments. Ann Occup Hyg 2007;51:553. |
|42.||Holmér I. Protective clothing in hot environments. Ind Health 2006;44:404-13. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Occupational Heat Stress: Multi-Country Observations and Interventions
| ||Leonidas G. Ioannou,Konstantinos Mantzios,Lydia Tsoutsoubi,Eleni Nintou,Maria Vliora,Paraskevi Gkiata,Constantinos N. Dallas,Giorgos Gkikas,Gerasimos Agaliotis,Kostas Sfakianakis,Areti K. Kapnia,Davide J. Testa,Tânia Amorim,Petros C. Dinas,Tiago S. Mayor,Chuansi Gao,Lars Nybo,Andreas D. Flouris |
| ||International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(12): 6303 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Occupational heat stress induced health impacts: A cross-sectional study from South Indian working population
| ||Vidhya Venugopal,P.K. Latha,Rekha Shanmugam,Manikandan Krishnamoorthy,Priscilla Johnson |
| ||Advances in Climate Change Research. 2020; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Development of an IoT-Based Construction Worker Physiological Data Monitoring Platform at High Temperatures
| ||Jung Hoon Kim,Byung Wan Jo,Jun Ho Jo,Do Keun Kim |
| ||Sensors. 2020; 20(19): 5682 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Estimation of Heat Stress and Maximum Acceptable Work Time Based on Physiological and Environmental Response in Hot-Dry Climate: A Case Study in Traditional Bakers
| ||Davood Afshari,Saeid Moradi,Kambiz Ahmadi Angali,Gholam-Abbas Shirali |
| ||The International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2019; 10(4): 194 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||A new outdoor environmental heat index (OEHI) as a simple and applicable heat stress index for evaluation of outdoor workers
| ||Farideh Golbabaei,Hamidreza Heidari,Aliakbar Shamsipour,Abbas Rahimi Forushani,Abbasali Gaeini |
| ||Urban Climate. 2019; 29: 100479 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Future heat stress arising from climate change on Iran’s population health
| ||Reza Modarres,Mohammad Ghadami,Sohrab Naderi,Mohammad Naderi |
| ||International Journal of Biometeorology. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Impacts of heat exposure on workers’ health and performance at steel plant in Turkey
| ||Abdel karim Fahed,Mehmet Ozkaymak,Siraj Ahmed |
| ||Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||A Comparison of the Correlation Between ESI and Other Thermal Indices (WBGT, WBDT, TWL, HI, SET, PET, PSI, and PSIHR): A Field Study
| ||Sajad Zare,Naser Hasheminejad,Saeid Ahmadi,Mokhles Bateni,Mohammad Reza Baneshi,Rasoul Hemmatjo |
| ||Health Scope. 2018; In Press(In Press) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Evaluation of indoor heat stress on workers of bakeries at Assiut City, Egypt
| ||R. E. Rabeiy |
| ||International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Workersæ health and productivity under occupational heat strain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
| ||Andreas D Flouris,Petros C Dinas,Leonidas G Ioannou,Lars Nybo,George Havenith,Glen P Kenny,Tord Kjellstrom |
| ||The Lancet Planetary Health. 2018; 2(12): e521 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Assessment of semen quality among the workers exposed to heat stress: an cross-sectional study in a steel industry
| ||Masoud Hamerezaee,Somayeh Farhang Dehghan,Farideh Golbabaei,Asad Fathi,Loghman Barzegar,Naseh Heidarnejad |
| ||Safety and Health at Work. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Assessment of occupational exposure to heat stress and solar ultraviolet radiation among groundskeepers in an eastern North Carolina university setting
| ||Nicole Beck,Jo Anne G. Balanay,Terri Johnson |
| ||Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 2017; : 0 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The Relationship Between Wet Bulb Globe Temperature and Physiological Strain Index in Muslim Women in Hot-Dry Condition in the Climatic Chamber
| ||Peymaneh Habibi,Habibollah Dehghan,Azam Haghi,Mahnaz Shakerian |
| ||Health Scope. 2015; 4(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Outdoor occupational environments and heat stress in IRAN
| ||Hamidreza Heidari,Farideh Golbabaei,Aliakbar Shamsipour,Abbas Rahimi Forushani,Abbasali Gaeini |
| ||Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering. 2015; 13(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The effect of fabric type of common Iranian working cloth on the induced cardiac and physiological strain under heat stress
| ||Roh Allah Parvari,Habib Allah Aghaei,Habibollah Dehghan,Ehsan Habibi,Mohammad Reza Maracy,Somayeh Farhang Dehghan |
| ||Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health. 2014; : 00 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|