Print this page Email this page
Users Online: 241
Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Int J Env Health Eng 2018,  7:6

Treatment of compost leachate by ferro-sonication process: Effect of some operational variables


1 Nutritional Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences; Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health and Nutrition, Khorramabad, Iran
2 Environment Research Center, Research Institute for Primordial Prevention of Noncommunicable Disease, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences; Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan, Iran

Date of Submission14-Dec-2017
Date of Acceptance27-Jun-2018
Date of Web Publication28-Jun-2018

Correspondence Address:
Bijan Bina
Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijehe.ijehe_12_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Aim: Application of composting process for the management of organic solid waste led to the production of leachate, which causes many problems to environment. This study was aimed at investigation of ferro-sonication (FS) process in composting leachate degradation. Materials and Methods: Leachate samples were collected in composting factory located in Isfahan. In each run, 400 ml of leachate was sonicationed through an ultrasonic homogenizer in a cylindrical glass reactor. Ferrous sulfate was added to the reactor as accelerator agent. The effect of various parameters including pH, ferrous sulfate doses, sonication times, and ultrasonic intensity was studied in the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biological oxygen demand (BOD) from composting leachate. Results: The results showed that the COD and BOD removal rate was increased by increasing ferrous sulfate dosages, sonication time, and ultrasonic intensity. In addition, lower pH was favored for leachate degradation. In general, the optimum conditions for pH, ferrous sulfate dosage, irradiation time, and ultrasonic intensity were 3, 8 mmol, 180 min, and 150 W, respectively. Approximately 46% of COD and 33% of BOD were removed in optimum condition. Conclusion: These results revealed that FS can be effective in degradation of compost leachate and can be presented as a good choice for pretreatment of leachate.

Keywords: Biological oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, compost leachate, ferro-sonication, ultrasonic


How to cite this article:
Karami MA, Amin MM, Bina B. Treatment of compost leachate by ferro-sonication process: Effect of some operational variables. Int J Env Health Eng 2018;7:6

How to cite this URL:
Karami MA, Amin MM, Bina B. Treatment of compost leachate by ferro-sonication process: Effect of some operational variables. Int J Env Health Eng [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 17];7:6. Available from: http://www.ijehe.org/text.asp?2018/7/1/6/235434




  Introduction Top


Solid waste management has become one of the most important problems in developed countries.[1] Several methods such as incineration, sanitary landfill, composting, grinding and discharging to sewer, compaction, dumping, milling, reduction, and anaerobic digestion have been implemented for solid waste disposal.[2] Nowadays, the global strategy on management of organic wastes has been aimed at recycling. Among different technologies for recycling of organic wastes, composting is often presented as a low-technology and low-investment process to transforming the wastes into stable products known as compost.[3] In this process, leachate is produced which has a variable and complex chemical and microbial composition.[4] Due to high loading, complex chemical composition, and variable seasonally volume, the leachate treatment processes are very difficult and expensive.[5] Common leachate treatment systems, such as air stripping, coagulation, flocculation, and settling, are often expensive regarding initial outlay of plant equipment, energy necessities, and regular use of additional chemicals. Coagulation–flocculation systems, for example, have some drawbacks, such as sludge production and increasing of aluminum or iron concentrations in the liquid phase.[6] Other techniques such as reverse osmosis or active carbon adsorption only change pollutant phase from wastewater to biomass or sludge [7] which subsequently creates other environmental problems. Thus, different combinations of physicochemical treatments have been used.[8] Recently, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have been suggested as an effective alternative for degradation of persistent organics in leachate. There are several types of AOPs including ozonation, Fenton process, ultrasonication, heterogeneous photocatalysis, ferro-sonication (FS), electrochemical oxidation, or even the combination of some of them that can be used in the treatment of leachate.[9] FS is a combination of ultrasonic irradiation and addition of FeSO4·7H2O. During ultrasonication, the formation, growth, and implosive collapse of bubbles in a liquid generates unusual chemical and physical environments, which subsequently induced chemical effects.[10] The collapse of bubbles produced high temperature which decomposes water (H2O) into highly reactive hydrogen atoms (H +) and hydroxyl radicals (OH ·). The generated radical species can also recombine to form hydrogen peroxide and molecular hydrogen or react with other molecules to initiate sonochemical degradations.[11]

Application of FS in the removal of persistent compounds has been reported previously. For example, Mohapatra et al.[12] applied FS as pretreatment for bisphenol A (BA). Result of their study showed that FS has positive effect in degradation of BA. Moreover, Pourzamani et al.[13] showed that combination of ultrasonic irradiation and H2O2 has positive effect in degradation of natural organic matter. It seems that application of FS can be useful in reduction of organic matter in compost leachate. Although many studies related to leachate treatment have been conducted previously, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no study regarding FS in the treatment of leachate. Given this hypothesis, the present work was performed to investigate the effect of FS in leachate degradation. Effect of parameters such as ferrous sulfate dosage, time of sonication, and input power in the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biological oxygen demand (BOD) was outlined.


  Materials and Methods Top


Leachate characteristics

The samples were taken from the Isfahan composting factory (ICF). ICF is located at the eastern parts of Isfahan city. About, 1000 tons of source-separated organic MSW deliver to the facility daily.[14] Untreated leachate was stored in refrigerator at 4 C for the duration of experiment. Before being used in the system, leachate was diluted using municipal wastewater. The brief characteristics of raw and diluted leachate are summarized in [Table 1].
Table 1: Some of the leachate sample characteristics

Click here to view


Chemicals and instruments

All the chemicals used in this study (H2 SO4, NaOH, and FeSO4·7H2O) were in analytical grade and were purchased from Merck Co (Germany).

Sonication was done by ultrasonic homogenizer (SONOPLUS HD, 3200, Bandelin, Germany) operating at 20 kHz equipped with a titanium probe transducer, 8 mm in diameter.

Procedures

The degradation of leachate compost was performed in a batch reactor. The reactor used for the experiments involving the sonication was consisted of a glass cylindrical reactor with the cooling jacket and the maximum working volume of 1L. In each run, 400 ml of diluted leachate [Table 1] was poured in the reactor. Thereafter, solution pH was adjusted by 10 N NaOH and H2 SO4 in desired ranges of 3, 5, 7, and 9. Ferrous sulfate in specified dosages was added to the reactor simultaneously with sonication. The introduced powers to the diluted leachate were 100, 120, and 150 W. For degradation of composting leachate, sonication was performed at times of 60, 150, 200, and 250 min and sampling was done at the end of each run, respectively. Measurements of pH, BOD5, and COD were done according to the standard methods for water and wastewater examination.[15] All experiments were performed in duplicate and the result was taken as the average value of the experiment. The obtained data were analyzed by Excel software.


  Results Top


In this study, the performance of FS for leachate degradation was evaluated. In addition, the effect of variables such as pH, ferrous sulfate dosages, input powers, and times of sonication was discussed.

Effect of pH

Influence of pH on COD removal is given in [Figure 1]. It can be seen that COD removal rate has an increasing trend by decrease of pH. The maximum removal of COD (43%) was achived in pH 3. Hence, pH of 3 considered optimum in the following.
Figure 1: Effect of solution pH on chemical oxygen demand removal in the ferro-sonication process (reaction time: 60 min, input power: 120 W, and ferrous sulfate dosage 4 mmol)

Click here to view


Effect of ferrous sulfate dosage

The added ferrous sulfate dosages in FS process were 2, 4, 8, and 12 mmol. In [Figure 2], it was observed that by increasing of ferrous sulfate dosages, the removal of COD and BOD increased. The maximum removal of COD and BOD was occurred in 8 mmol ferrous sulfate.
Figure 2: Effect of on chemical oxygen demand and biological oxygen demand removal in the ferro-sonication process (reaction time: 120 min, input power: 120 W, and solution pH of 3)

Click here to view


Influence of sonication time on chemical oxygen demand and biological oxygen demand removal

[Figure 3] illustrates the effect of sonication time (60, 120, 180, and 250 min) on the removal of COD and BOD. The experiments in this stage were carried out in the optimum ferrous sulfate dosage 8 mmol, power of 120 W, and pH of 9. It is clear that the COD and BOD removal increased as the time of sonication increased. Approximately 41% removal of COD was achieved by FS in 250 min.
Figure 3: Effect of sonication times on chemical oxygen demand and biological oxygen demand removal in the ferro-sonication process (ferrous sulfate dosage: 8 mmol, input power: 120 W, and solution pH of 3)

Click here to view


Effect of ultrasonic power

Degradation of compost leachate was investigated at different ultrasonic powers (100, 120, and 150 w), solution pH 9, ferrous sulfate dosage of 8 mmol, and 180 min sonication time. As shown in [Figure 4], COD and BOD removal increased by increasing of input powers. Approximately 46% of COD was removed at the power of 150 w.
Figure 4: Effect of input powers on chemical oxygen demand and biological oxygen demand removal in the ferro-sonication process (ferrous sulfate dosage: 8 mmol, sonication time: 180 min, and solution pH of 3)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Solution pH has an important effect on chemical process. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of FS on COD and BOD removal of leachate compost. In this regard, the effect of pH was evaluated. FS process is combination of ultrasonic irradiation and addition of FeSO4.7H2O. Ultrasonication led to decomposition of water into reactive H +, and OH in zones have higher temperature and hydrogen peroxide in the cooling phase.[16] It is expected higher production of OH• radicals can occur due to the reaction between hydrogen peroxide and Fe2+ (equation 1).



The COD removal rates were higher in low pH solution [Figure 1]. In pH 3, approximately 33% of COD was removed. This is in accordance with the results reported by Vilar et al.[18] who evaluated Fenton process in the treatment of landfill leachate. The result of their study showed that about 65% of COD removed at pH of 3. As shown in [Figure 1] by increasing of pH, removal rate decreased, and in pH 9, about 9% of COD was removed. In alkaline environment, precipitation of Fe2+ can occur which in turn decreased the required amount for effective production of OH radicals. Generation of OH radicals in FS process led to degradation of leachate and therefore removal of COD and BOD.

Increasing of ferrous sulfate dosage led to increase of COD and BOD removal. As shown in [Figure 2] by increase of ferrous sulfate dosage from 2 to 8 mmol, the removal of COD and BOD increased from 13% to 36% and 10% to 31%, respectively. Increase of ferrous sulfate dosage from 8 to 12 mmol causes a slightly decrease in removal rate. The optimum ferrous sulfate concentration for maximum COD and BOD removal was 8 mmol. In general, the removal of organic matters improves with increasing concentration of iron salt. Many studies have shown that usage of a much higher concentration of Fe2+ can lead to the self-inhibition of OH radical by Fe2+ ions and decrease the degradation rate of pollutants: OH· + Fe2+ → Fe3+ + OH .[19]

The effect of reaction time on COD and BOD removal through FS process was survived. As shown in [Figure 3], the removal of COD and BOD increases with the increasing of the ultrasonic irradiation time. Approximately 37% and 30% of COD and BOD removal rate was obtained at a time of 180 min, respectively. This time was determined as equilibrium time for COD and BOD removal. After that time, a considerable change did not observed in COD and BOD removal. Reaction time is a key factor in Fenton process. By increasing of sonication times, formation both of OH · and O2· may be promoted.[20] The results of this study are in line with the results obtained by others [21],[22],[23] who stated that by increasing of sonication time, removal rate was increased.

Influence of ultrasonic intensity on COD and BOD removal was evaluated. [Figure 4] shows the effect of different ultrasonic irradiation intensity on COD and BOD removal. It is clear that degradation efficiency increased with ultrasonic intensity. The percentage removal was 19%, 31%, and 46% for COD and 9%, 27%, and 33% for BOD in sonication powers of 100, 120, and 150 W, respectively. Increasing of ultrasonic intensity increased the COD and BOD removal. It can be assumed that higher intensity results in more turbulence of the solution, which in turn, increases the reactive radicals.[20] This result is in good agreement with the results obtained by others.[10],[20]


  Conclusion Top


In this study, the degradation of compost leachate by FS process was investigated under a variety of operating conditions. The results show that COD and BOD removal intensified with increasing ferrous sulfate addition, ultrasonic intensity, and decrease in solution pH. The optimum conditions for FS including ultrasonic irradiation time, solution pH, ultrasonic intensity, and ferrous sulfate dosage were 180 min, 3, 150 W, and 8 mmol. Application of this method can be a good choice for pretreatment of wastewater and leachate before conducting of biological treatment. However, it must be consider in economical aspect.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Amin M, Ahmad Moazzam M. Advanced oxidation treatment of composting leachate of municipal solid waste by ozone-hydrogen peroxide. Int J Environ Health Eng 2014;3:21.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Mojiri A, Aziz HA, Zaman NQ, Aziz SQ, Zahed MA. Powdered ZELIAC augmented sequencing batch reactors (SBR) process for co-treatment of landfill leachate and domestic wastewater. J Environ Manage 2014;139:1-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Trujillo D, Font X, Sánchez A. Use of fenton reaction for the treatment of leachate from composting of different wastes. J Hazard Mater 2006;138:201-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Brown K, Ghoshdastidar AJ, Hanmore J, Frazee J, Tong AZ. Membrane bioreactor technology: A novel approach to the treatment of compost leachate. Waste Manag 2013;33:2188-94.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Abood AR, Bao J, Du J, Zheng D, Luo Y. Non-biodegradable landfill leachate treatment by combined process of agitation, coagulation, SBR and filtration. Waste Manag 2014;34:439-47.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Silva AC, Dezotti M, Sant'Anna GL Jr. Treatment and detoxification of a sanitary landfill leachate. Chemosphere 2004;55:207-14.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Sharma S, Buddhdev J, Patel M, Ruparelia JP. Studies on degradation of reactive red 135 dye in wastewater using ozone. Procedia Eng 2013;51:451-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Shu Z, Lü Y, Huang J, Zhang W. Treatment of compost leachate by the combination of coagulation and membrane process. Chin J Chem Eng 2016;24:1369-74.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ribeiro AR, Nunes OC, Pereira MF, Silva AM. An overview on the advanced oxidation processes applied for the treatment of water pollutants defined in the recently launched directive 2013/39/EU. Environ Int 2015;75:33-51.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Wang XK, Wei YC, Wang C, Guo WL, Wang JG, Jiang JX. Ultrasonic degradation of reactive brilliant red K-2BP in water with CCl 4 enhancement: Performance optimization and degradation mechanism. Sep Purif Technol 2011;81:69-76.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Wang X, Yao Z, Wang J, Guo W, Li G. Degradation of reactive brilliant red in aqueous solution by ultrasonic cavitation. Ultrason Sonochem 2008;15:43-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Mohapatra DP, Brar SK, Tyagi RD, Picard P, Surampalli RY. Ferro-sonication and partial ozonation pre-treatment and biotransformation of wastewater sludge for degradation of bisphenol A: Rheology studies. Chem Eng Sci 2012;81:20-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Pourzamani H, Majd AM, Attar HM, Bina B. Natural organic matter degradation using combined process of ultrasonic and hydrogen peroxide treatment. Anu Inst Geociencias 2015 ;38:63-72.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Bakhshoodeh R, Alavi N, Majlesi M, Paydary P. Compost leachate treatment by a pilot-scale subsurface horizontal flow constructed wetland. Ecol Eng 2017;105:7-14.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Rice EW, Greenberg AE, Franson MA. APHA: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Centennial Edition. Washington, DC: APHA, AWWA, WEF; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mohapatra DP, Brar SK, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY. Parameter optimization of ferro-sonication pre-treatment process for degradation of bisphenol A and biodegradation from wastewater sludge using response surface model. J Hazard Mater 2011;189:100-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ertugay N, Acar FN. Removal of COD and color from direct blue 71 azo dye wastewater by Fenton's oxidation: Kinetic study. Arabian J Chem 2017;10:1158-63.   Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Vilar A, Eiroa M, Kennes C, Veiga MC. Optimization of the landfill leachate treatment by the Fenton process. Water Environ J 2013;27:120-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Ahmadian M, Reshadat S, Yousefi N, Mirhossieni SH, Zare MR, Ghasemi SR, et al. Municipal leachate treatment by fenton process: Effect of some variable and kinetics. J Environ Public Health 2013;2013:169682.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Nuengmatcha P, Chanthai S, Mahachai R, Oh WC. Sonocatalytic performance of ZnO/graphene/TiO 2 nanocomposite for degradation of dye pollutants (methylene blue, texbrite BAC-L, texbrite BBU-L and texbrite NFW-L) under ultrasonic irradiation. Dyes Pigments 2016;134:487-97.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Shirsath SR, Patil AP, Patil R, Naik JB, Gogate PR, Sonawane SH, et al. Removal of brilliant green from wastewater using conventional and ultrasonically prepared poly (acrylic acid) hydrogel loaded with kaolin clay: A comparative study. Ultrason Sonochem 2013;20:914-23.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Xiong SF, Yin ZL, Yuan ZF, Yan WB, Yang WY, Liu JJ, et al. Dual-frequency (20/40 kHz) ultrasonic assisted photocatalysis for degradation of methylene blue effluent: Synergistic effect and kinetic study. Ultrason Sonochem 2012;19:756-61.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Mehrdad A, Hashemzadeh R. Ultrasonic degradation of rhodamine B in the presence of hydrogen peroxide and some metal oxide. Ultrason Sonochem 2010;17:168-72.  Back to cited text no. 23
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed537    
    Printed70    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded178    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal